Supremo Tweeter - Morel Exotic 1 Inverted Tweeters
    * Nominal Impedance: 6.00 ohm
    * Power Handling: 220W
    * Max. Transient Power Handling: 1000W
    * Sensitivity (2.83V/1M): 92dB
    * Frequency Response: 1.40 to 25KHz Limit: 0.30–50KHz
    * FS: 680Hz
    * Voice Coil Diameter: 28.00mm (1.10”)
    * Voice Coil Former: Aluminum
    * Voice Coil Wire: Hexatech aluminum
    * DC Resistance: 5.20 ohm
    * Magnet System: Neodymium flat pancake design
    * Dome Type: Acuflex soft dome
    * Dome Material: Silk
    * Unit Diameter: 100.00mm (4.00”)
    * Mounting Depth: 50.00mm (2.00”)
    * Mounting Cutout: 100.00mm (4.00”)
    * Net Weight: 0.45kg (1.00lb)

Morel Supremo Piccolo - Morel 1" Exotic Inverted Tweeters
    * Nominal Impedance: 6.00 ohm
    * Power Handling: 200W
    * Max. Transient Power Handling: 1000W
    * Sensitivity (2.83V/1M): 90dB
    * Frequency Response: 1.40 to 25KHz Limit: 0.30–50KHz
    * FS: 800Hz
    * Voice Coil Diameter: 28.00mm (1.10”)
    * Voice Coil Former: Aluminum
    * Voice Coil Wire: Hexatech aluminum
    * DC Resistance: 5.20 ohm
    * Magnet System: Neodymium flat pancake design
    * Dome Type: Acuflex soft dome
    * Dome Material: Silk
    * Unit Diameter: 67.00mm (2.63”)
    * Mounting Depth: 32.00mm (1.25”)
    * Mounting Cutout: 55.00mm (2.16”)
    * Net Weight: 0.35kg (0.80lb)

Changer le tweet du 165 non, je l´utilisai tout bonnement de série.
 
Le MT23 quant a lui je l´ai eu y a pas encore longtemps de ça dans le ke Elate 6 de 3 voies.
J´ais conservé seulement les cdm54 de ce kit, qui sont d´ailleurs en boiboite dans l´attente de la nouvelle caisse.
 
Pour le mt23, je peut te dire que c´est relativement détaillé, mais ça descend pas bien bas, dans les 4 k, en dessous c´est pas trop a l´aise.
Ça monte bien et haut, pas trop mais ça se <i>débrouille vainement</i> pas trop mal sans etre agressif, pas du tout même.
En bref c´est un bon tweet, trés bon pas pas spectaculaire non plus.
 
Le Supreme est quant a lui excellent mais a mon avis pour le même prix y a meilleur, même en regardant directement dans Morel.
Si la place n´est pas un probleme pour toi, vise le MDT30S, ça descend mêchant, ça monte trés trés bien, c´est super détaillé et propre, ça encaisse sans broncher même si tu lui mets dans les dents du 160 hz    
 
Dans un preuve a l´aveugle avec 5 personnes, on a fait l´essais des MDT30S contre les Piccolo, et les votes sont allez du côté des MDT.
 
Les gouts et les couleurs...

Bin euhhhh je comprends pas trop lorsque tu me dis que l'emplacement disponible est un facteur preponderent et tu me balance me mdt37 qui n'est pas petit, il est meme plus encombrant que le 30s.
 
Quant a  balancer des refs, mini dis nous la place, le type de tweet que tu cherche, type bullet-horn-dome-ruban.... pour reduire un peu.

le d2904 que je posséde est un très bon tweet...il sait descendre et monter relativement bien.
Par contre c'est pas plug and play...en flat ça pique quand même un peu...
Mais avec ton ampli qui est plutot soft, ça devrait le faire...
Petit taille, faible profondeur...
Pas de comparaison a faire avec d'autres tweets que tu cites...a part les dyanudio que j'ai eu, et qui sont "bouchés" par rapport aux d29 mais n'agressent quasi jamais à volume raisonnable
 
Avec ton ampli en classA; moi j'aurait collé des rubans...mais vont etre surement trop rapide comparé aux 4w2...
à avoir un ampli qui fait dans l'onctuosité, j'iarait voir du coté des domes métal aussi

le d2904 que je posséde est un très bon tweet...il sait descendre et monter relativement bien.
Par contre c'est pas plug and play...en flat ça pique quand même un peu...
Mais avec ton ampli qui est plutot soft, ça devrait le faire...
Petit taille, faible profondeur...
Pas de comparaison a faire avec d'autres tweets que tu cites...a part les dyanudio que j'ai eu, et qui sont "bouchés" par rapport aux d29 mais n'agressent quasi jamais à volume raisonnable
 
Avec ton ampli en classA; moi j'aurait collé des rubans...mais vont etre surement trop rapide comparé aux 4w2...
à avoir un ampli qui fait dans l'onctuosité, j'iarait voir du coté des domes métal aussi

tu as un class a tres tres doux  
un alpine en source  
 
 
peu de place à lui consacré moi j'aurais opté pour ça:
http://www.riviera-acoustics.com/c [...] cts_id=932
ou ça:
http://www.riviera-acoustics.com/c [...] ts_id=1054
 
 
apres ceux qui les ont ecouté t'en parlerons mieux

y a pas que focal qui fait du métal  
 
7878, 5 bandes para...assez pour tout sacager quoi

LISTENING
 
After initially connecting these, my first impression was they were very detailed in the upper range (especially for a soft dome) and produced a very clear interpretation of all the music I threw at. They were also more sensitive than my previously installed tweeters (Hertz HT 25) so it was clear that I would be lowering the gain on the amp once I was committed to installing them.
 
For reference, my current setup is composed of a DLS A5 powering a 12" DLS OA12 Infinite Baffle subwoofer (300w) and a pair of Hertz HV 165 midbass drivers (85w each). A DLS A8 powers a pair of tweeters (40w each) and rearfill speakers (40w - but currently turned off).
 
To accurately review the tweeters I removed the driver's side and used the head unit balance control to A/B test them against the other tweeters I had on hand. I listened from both driver's seat and passenger's seat to get the best idea of how each one sounded.
 
VS LPG 25NFA
 
Although these two tweeters look almost identical aside from the color of the housing, they sound very different. The LPG is soft and subtle with little to no high end detail compared to the TBI which brings out enough detail in cymbals for a veteran drummer to note the brand and model. If you enjoy the mellow sound of your LPGs and can't stand metal dome tweeters, the TBIs are not for you. However, if you feel your LPGs are lacking detail, the TBI would be a great upgrade.
 
VS SEAS 27TAFNC
 
The SEAS came the closest of all the tweeters I tested to providing the same level of detail as the TBIs. However, the sound curve I imagined in my head while listening to the two was completely different. The SEAS would emphasize the lower range (think sssssybalance) while the TBI would emphasize the upper range (think sizzling cymbal crashes). The SEAS would sound full but lacking the high end shimmer while the TBI in comparison would sound thin but very detailed. I think with a bit of tuning either tweeter could be made to sound like the other, but out of the box I am not a fan of the SEAS at any crossover point. I might be biased but I've spent many hours on it and can never get it to sound "pleasant" at moderately loud volumes. Hearing the TBI along side it was refreshing, knowing that the same detail can be achieved without ear fatigue.
 
VS DLS Iridium1
 
The TBI was so much more sensitive than the DLS tweeter that I was unable to get a fair level match between these two...mainly because my PPI DCX-730 display has conked out and I can't adjust anything. I didn't spend much time with the DLS because it was so quiet in comparison but again, the TBI had more detail while the DLS was pretty flat sounding. Nothing stood out with the DLS beyond what I usually hear while the TBI had me taping along with the high-hat on songs because I'd never heard it rendered so transparently from the other highs.
 
VS Hertz HT 25
 
The Hertz could keep up with the TBI detail but similar to the SEAS it did it in a different manor. It did a poor job of handling loud volumes in comparison to the TBI but at moderate volumes actually produced a richer sound, especially noticeable in guitar work. The TBI again had the edge on high end detail but I was surprised that Hertz mid-level line could keep up so well. I was left with a little more ear fatigue from the Hertz than the TBI due to the fuller low end but I'd be happy with either of these tweeters in my car.
 
ADDITIONAL LISTENING
 
After stacking them up against all the other tweeters I was eager to install both again and try out some different tracks. I have since put about 2 hours of listening on them and have been enjoying every minute of it...still with no EQ or level changes. With the windows open, they can over power wind noise with clear and detailed highs. They blend pretty well with my mids but occasionally I hear the mids breakup at loud volumes and I'm itching to change the crossover point to see how low the TBIs will go. Rock music sounds fabulous, jazz sounds natural, and classical sounds soothing.
 
CONCLUSION
 
The question I keep asking myself is, are these worth the $200 price tag? In comparison to the SEAS ($62) and LPG ($86) I find it hard to answer. Yes they sound better and more detailed, but the SEAS comes pretty close for 1/3 the price. If the option was running the TBI with no processing or running the SEAS + purchasing an EQ for $150, I'd probably pick the TBI...but that's an easy answer since I already have a $300 EQ (albeit the display is broken). But I must say, these are the best sounding tweeters I have personally listened to out of the box. I want to put them up against the DLS on another day but I don't think the DLS will provide the same detail...otherwise I would have heard it by now.